Cultivating critical thinking-oriented teachers in pre-service language teacher education

This submission has open access
Abstract Summary

Critical thinking (CT) has been advocated as both a crucial component and outcome in many pe-service language teacher education programs around the world. To date, however, there is a dearth of research on how CT is conceptualized and operationalized in pre-service language teacher education. In particular, while CT entails various dimensions, including skill (e.g., critical argumentation and unbiased judgment), disposition (e.g., open-mindedness and inquisitiveness), and action (e.g., ethical and agentive practice towards social equality and transformation), we know little about how these dimensions are integrated to support language teachers' professional learning. In view of such research gaps, this study investigated to what extent and how a group of student teachers were prepared to become CT-oriented language teachers in a Hong Kong-based pre-service teacher education program. Drawing on data from semi-structured interviews and relevant documents, the findings of the study reveal a rich yet unbalanced coverage of CT instruction, the transferability of CT learning to its teaching, as well as the rhetoric-reality gap in developing CT-related pedagogy. The findings provide useful implications at classroom and curriculum levels to facilitate the integration of CT into second language teacher education.

Submission ID :
AILA1173
Argument :

Based on a tripartite conceptual framework with an integrated focus on the coverage, coherence, and applicability of pre-service teacher education curriculums (e.g., Canrinus, et al., 2017; Goh & Wong, 2015), the study explores to what extent and how student teachers are prepared to become CT-oriented language teachers in Hong Kong. The findings show that the student teachers fostered their CT as both skills and dispositions through rich professional engagements (e.g., coursework, immersion, practicum, and final research projects) and continuous interactions with university-based teacher educators and school mentors. Additionally, the development of CT started from the content courses that addressed general topics, and moved to the language pedagogy courses and teaching practicum, where the participants applied CT to make sense of language teaching and learning through contextualized practices. Such a finding reveals a sense of coherence of the program that progressed with the gradual infusion of CT into the content and processes of language teacher education. The coherence and applicability of the program were also evident in the transferability of student teachers' CT learning to its teaching in language classrooms. Influenced by their own CT-related experiences, the participants learned to appreciate the constitutive relationship between CT and language education as another crucial attribute of a CT-oriented teacher. Moreover, they actively constructed their pedagogical beliefs about how to teach CT. For instance, the student teachers described a dialogic interactive approach to CT teaching derived from the modelling provided by their previous course teachers and teacher educators in the program.  


On the other hand, the findings speak to the rhetoric-reality gap in learning to teach CT, which has been widely observed in many pre-service teacher education programs across the globe (Goh & Wong, 2015). While CT had been advocated in the program, there was generally an absence of practical resources and scaffolding on how to teach CT in language classrooms. Without sufficient and applicable training, the student teachers occasionally practiced CT at the surface level (e.g., during the teaching practicum) instead of approaching it as a systematic cognitive process based on relevant and meaningful content. This limitation of the program partially relates to the lack of coverage on the "action" dimension in CT instruction throughout program. As CT was mostly trained as a set of skills and dispositions that operated within individual student teachers' minds, the participants were not able to engage actively and critically with the complex institutional and socio-cultural reality for potential teaching innovation and transformation. It is therefore important for current pre-service teacher education programs to incorporate a direct focus on the teaching of CT in relation to the local school reality. 


References 

Canrinus, E. T., Bergem, O. K., Klette, K., & Hammerness, K. (2017). Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies49(3), 313-333.

Goh, P. S. C., & Wong, K. T. (2015). Exploring the challenges for teacher educators. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 5(1), 37-45.

Associate Professor
,
University of Macau
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
29 hits