This paper presents text corpora analyses of political and public discourses on foreign language (FL) education alongside statistical data on actual uptake. It does so by comparing both declared (official) FL policy, debated policies and actual uptake of FL learning in a number of different European political entities: Ireland, the 4 nations of the UK, 4 Laender of Germany, and the EU. It thus compares FL education policy making in Anglophone and non Anglophone nation states, as well as those belong to the EU, and not, and addresses the questions:
1. Between Anglophone and non-Anglophone nations, and those part of the EU, and not, how do FL policies compare in respect of:
policy and curricula demands for compulsory FL learning?
rationales as expressed in curricula policies?
2. How do political (parliamentary) and public (journalistic) debates differ in these respects in these nations?
3. Concerning practised policies, does actual uptake match policy? Does this differ between Anglophone and non-Anglophone entities? How is the learning of a diversity of FL other than English safeguarded?
The paper reports on a longitudinal project which examined political debates, journalistic texts and actual FL policy documents using Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Lingusitics, combined with latest uptake statistics.