English Language Education Policy in Bangladesh-Policy, Ideology and Inequality

This submission has open access
Abstract Summary

This paper examines the presence of English language ideologies in language-in-education policy and discourses in Bangladesh. Bangladesh has never had a consistent policy on language in schools. Sometimes English has been encouraged, sometimes it has been limited, and sometimes it has been forbidden. Although the Constitution of Bangladesh states that education should be free and compulsory for all children, in practice many children do not attend a school or do so for only a short time. Within the context of severe social, economic, and educational problems, English remains a primary language of education and employment. This paper will focus on the inequitable education system in Bangladesh. To find the answer to the research questions two types of data are examined: (1) archives and documents, including newspapers and historical documents, and (2) interviews with the key policy planners. Based on the data examined in this article, several conclusions are reached.  First, English is not regarded as a colonial burden, but rather most Bangladeshi people have a favorable attitude towards English, with instrumental motivation for learning English. Second, English education seems to create class divisions, with only the upper class benefiting from the present pro-English policy. 

Submission ID :
AILA602
Submission Type
Argument :

English is regarded as a global language. It is by no means divested itself of a cultural context. English was introduced into South Asia by the British. Nearly all the postcolonial countries (e.g., India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Nepal) in that region experienced long periods of political, economic, and linguistic domination. Although those postcolonial countries have taken different paths to nation-building, policies on instructional medium in schools have been key drivers of national development in India and Bangladesh. English, along with indigenous languages such as Bengali and Hindi, plays an important role in everyday activities in Bangladesh. Language is an instrument of political, economic, and social imperialism. This paper uses historical documents, government data, and structured interviews with Bangladesh's policy planners to examine the linguistic impact of English on South Asia, particularly in Bangladesh. The impact is based on the link between one's proficiency in the English language and one's social privilege, which emanates from having English-language skills. Such impact is also indicated in the deleterious effects of language use in Bangladesh-that is, in engendering disparities in economic status conditioned by disparities in the proficiency in the use of English. The purpose of this paper is to describe and examine the present status of Bengali and English in the educational system of South Asia. The research questions were - (i) Is English a colonial burden? (ii) Who benefits from the present policy? Viswanathan (1989) noted that English-language teaching in India could be regarded as a form of social, cultural, and political control. It basically produced a class alienated from its own language and culture and discontented with the colonial rule. Currently, in Indian education, as well as in Bangladeshi education, English plays a special role. English is used as a language of administration, inter-state communication, and higher education in India and Bangladesh, for projecting cultural heritage, economic programs, tourism, politics, industry, trade, foreign policies and research findings overseas. English is becoming increasingly pervasive in India, where it is used for instrumental purposes because it provides opportunities in the job market and in higher education. South Asian students in India and Bangladesh have a positive attitude toward English, which is regarded as a "language of opportunity" in that it plays an important role in Indian society and is no longer regarded as a burden of colonialism. In South Asia, English is generally not viewed as a colonial burden but as an international or neutral language; it provides opportunities. Thus public pressure for English language teaching at an early age is widespread. However, for most children, English language proficiency is quite low because of the low level of teachers' English language proficiency and the low quality of English language education. Thus, the present policy continues to support advantages for groups having access to English education, while contributing to the ongoing educational difficulties facing the rural and urban poor. This paper calls for language planning and policy that emphasizes pedagogic equity.

Professor
,
Waseda University

Similar Abstracts by Type

Submission ID
Submission Title
Submission Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
AILA851
[SYMP59] OPEN CALL - Language & holistic ecology
Oral Presentation
She/Her Aliyah Morgenstern
AILA911
[SYMP17] Adult Migrants Acquiring Basic Literacy Skills in a Second Language
Oral Presentation
She/Her Kaatje Dalderop
AILA990
[SYMP17] Adult Migrants Acquiring Basic Literacy Skills in a Second Language
Oral Presentation
She/Her MOUTI ANNA
AILA484
[SYMP47] Literacies in CLIL: subject-specific language and beyond
Oral Presentation
She/Her Natalia Evnitskaya
AILA631
[SYMP15] AILA ReN Social cohesion at work: shared languages as mortar in professional settings
Oral Presentation
He/Him Henrik Rahm
AILA583
[SYMP24] Changing perspectives towards multilingual education: teachers, learners and researchers as agents of social cohesion
Oral Presentation
She/Her Alessandra Periccioli
AILA238
[SYMP81] Reflections on co-production as a research practice in the field of foreign language teaching and learning
Oral Presentation
She/Her Martina Zimmermann
AILA290
[SYMP36] Fluency as a multilingual practice: Concepts and challenges
Oral Presentation
He/Him Shungo Suzuki
28 hits